Download PITT SLIM & DJ BIZZY
new mixtape "Nolita Nights"
NOW!!!!
It features Dirt Nasty, Cisco Adler, Shwayze, Ski Beatz, The Apple
Juice Kid and more!!
Tuesday, August 4, 2009
Friday, April 10, 2009
DJ Gigahurtz - SELECTRO v.1 - 2009
Dj Gigahurtz - Selectro v1.0 - Complete Track listing
Download Here: http://tinyurl.com/sel
Download Here: http://tinyurl.com/sel
1. Bag Raiders - Shooting Stars
2. Young Boss - Shooting Stars (Party Rock Remix) (Ghz Edit)
3. GigzsterZ - Punish Game
4. Laidback Luke - Break the House Down
5. Kid Cudi - Day N Nite - Mobin Master Remix
6. Michael Minds - Tear the Ride Up (Rock it Scientists Edit)
7. Coldplay - Viva La Vida (DiscoTech Remix)
8. Ei8ht - Best Shot Part DeauX
9. GigzsterZ - Electro Lolipop
10. Dj Stonnie - Electro In the Ayer
11. GigzsterZ - Universal Disko
12. CeCe Peniston - Finally (Dj Playtime Remix)
13. Katy Perry - I Kissed A Girl (Andy Harding Remix)
14. Pitbull - I Know You Want Me (Calle Ocho)
15. Mischa Daniels - Round & Round (Electro Remix)
16. Strike One - Abracadabra
17. GigzsterZ - Club in This Love
18. Kanye West - Homecoming (Discotech Remix)
19. M.I.A. - Paper Planes (Cold Blank Remix)
20. Crazy Town - Butterfly (Dj Vini Remix)
21. Yves Larock - Bucovina - (Alex Astero Edit)
22. Andrew Spencer & The Vamprockerz - Zombie
23. GigzsterZ - Go Go Girl
24. Katy Pery - Hot N Cold (LMFAO Remix)
25. Disfunktion - Be vs Push the Feeling
26. Eric Prydz - Pjanoo vs Wonderwall
27. Pink - So What (Flipside & Arzadon Remix)
28. Justice - D.A.N.C.E (Mstrkrft vs Stuart Prince Remix)
29. Dj Megaman - Just Dance (GigzsterZ Edit)
30. Hardnox - She's with the DJ
31. GigzsterZ - Freak Right Na (Ghz Edit)
32. Wideboys - Call on Me (Serafin Edit)
33. Royksopp - What Else is There
34. Joseph - Your Love Still Haunts Me (Dj Bam Bam Remix)
Thursday, March 5, 2009
DJ Spair - Whats Pop'N' - Club Mix
FOLLOW THE LINK FOR AND DOWNLOAD FOR FREE!
http://www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=ed18438ac07dc56d4012e8015643d9c8a30672501a7ddf8d
http://www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=ed184
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
DJ Doc Rok Presents: Motown Electronic
Checkout DJ Doc Rok
EP is now available for free download, six classic Motown tracks remixed with a real funky dance music sound. This will inspire forward thinking music enthusiasts everywhere!
EP is now available for free download, six classic Motown tracks remixed with a real funky dance music sound. This will inspire forward thinking music enthusiasts everywhere!
You can download below, or head over to www.djdocrok.com for a free full download:
Tracklisting:
1. Shotgun (Dj Doc Rok vs Jr Walker & The Allstars)
2. Uptight! (Dj Doc Rok vs. Marvin Gaye)
3. Shadows of Love (Dj Doc Rok vs. The Four Tops)
4. Smiling Faces (Dj Doc Rok vs. The Temptations)
5. Do You Love Me (Dj Doc Rok vs. The Contours)
6. Tracks of my Tears (Dj Doc Rok vs. The Miracles)
add him on Facebook!
follow him on Twitter!
add him on Myspace!
------------------------------
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Dinner w/ Mark Cuban @ Nine Steakhouse :: Open Source the World!
The Mark Cuban Stimulus Plan - Open Source Funding
Its easy to write about what the government or other people should do with our/their money. It’s harder to come up with a course of action that I can undertake on my own that possibly, somehow could make a difference. My first inclination is always to try to look “for the next big thing”. But the next big thing is just that, next. Its not now. Its Venture Capital. Its not self funding, renewal capital.
Rather than trying to be a Venture Capitalist, I was looking for an idea that hopefully could inspire people to create businesses that could quickly become self funding. Businesses that just needed a jump start to get the ball rolling and create jobs. Im a big believer that entrepreneurs will lead us out of this mess. I just needed a way to help.
So here it is. Some people will love it, some will hate it. It is what it is.
You must post your business plan here on my blog where I expect other people can and will comment on it. I also expect that other people will steal the idea and use it elsewhere. That is the idea. Call this an open source funding environment.
If its a good idea and worth funding, we want it replicated elsewhere. The idea is not just to help you, but to figure out how to help the economy through hard work and ingenuity. If you come up with the idea and get funding, you have a head start. If you execute better than others, you could possibly make money at it. As you will see from the rules below, these are going to be businesses that are mostly driven by sweat equity.
I will invest money in businesses presented here on this blog. No minimum, no maximum, but a very specific set of rules. Here they are:
1. It can be an existing business or a start up.
2. It can not be a business that generates any revenue from advertising. Why ? Because I want this to be a business where you sell something and get paid for it. Thats the only way to get and stay profitable in such a short period of time.
3. It MUST BE CASH FLOW BREAK EVEN within 60 days
4. It must be profitable within 90 days.
5. Funding will be on a monthly basis. If you dont make your numbers, the funding stops
6. You must demonstrate as part of your plan that you sell your product or service for more than what it costs you to produce, fully encumbered
7. Everyone must work. The organization is completely flat. There are no employees reporting to managers. There is the founder/owners and everyone else
8. You must post your business plan here, or you can post it on slideshare.com , scribd.com or google docs, all completely public for anyone to see and/or download
9. I make no promises that if your business is profitable, that I will invest more money. Once you get the initial funding you are on your own
10. I will make no promises that I will be available to offer help. If I want to , I will. If not, I wont.
11. If you do get money, it goes into a bank that I specify, and I have the ability to watch the funds flow and the opportunity to require that I cosign any outflows.
12. In your business plan , make sure to specify how much equity I will receive or how I will get a return on my money.
13. No mult-level marketing programs (added 2/10/09 1pm)
Im sure I will come up with more rules as I see what comes along, if anything.
As I find businesses I like, I will use the email address you provide before you post to get in contact with you. There will be a standard agreement, you can take it or leave it. Once I have done the standard agreement, I will post it here for all to see. This will definitely be a work in progress. Maybe it leads to great things, maybe it leads to nothing. We will find out. Im not going to claim a minimum or maximum amount or total I will invest. Im not promising I will definitely invest anything. If nothing comes along that I think is viable, thats the way it goes.
Hopefully I will invest in quite a few businesses that will lead to something more
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Click on the link at the top of the BLOG to access & post your biz plan!!! Good Luck 2 All
Saturday, February 7, 2009
Thursday, February 5, 2009
Performance Right Act Reintroduced To Congress
Performance Right Act Reintroduced To Congress
February 04, 2009 - Legal and Management
By Ed Christman, N.Y.
As expected the Performance Right Act has been reintroduced jointly to Congress today with Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Senators Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Bob Corker (R-TN), and Barbara Boxer (D-CA) submitting it in the Senate, while in the House by Representatives, it was sponsored by Rep. John Conyers (D-MI), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, and Representatives Howard Berman (D-CA), Darrell Issa (R-CA), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), Jane Harman (D-CA), John Shadegg (R-AZ), and Paul Hodes (D-NH).
While radio already pays songwriters for songs they broadcast over the air, the bill would require royalties to also be paid the artists and musicians performing the songs and master recordings copyright owners, as well.
The latter payment is common in other countries and has already been enacted in the U.S. for Webcasters, satellite radio, cable radio services and all other non-terrestrial broadcasters.
Upon introduction of the Performance Rights Act in the Senate and House of Representatives, music FIRST executive director Jennifer Bendall, said in a statement, "Today marks the beginning of the end for corporate radio's loophole."
"It's unfair, unjustified and un-American that artists and musicians are paid absolutely nothing when their recordings are played on AM and FM radio," she added.
Grammy winner Sam Moore noted, "American broadcasters literally earn billions by playing our records. All we ask is to receive what artists in every other civilized country around the world receive when their recordings are broadcast - fair compensation for the performance of our work."
American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada (AFM) urges Congress to pass the Performance Rights Act because "The overwhelming majority of performers are not rich, but hardworking men and women trying to make a living," AFM President Tom Lee said in a statement.
Besides the U.S., only a few countries do not provide a fair performance right on radio, including Iran, North Korea and China. Since the U.S. doesn't have a performance right, foreign stations do not have to pay American artists when their music is played on stations around the globe.
A2IM President Rich Bengloff labeled the bills sponsors "true friends of the music community who understand that creators of music and those that invest in its creation should be compensated for their work. As the manufacturing and service industries have moved offshore, the need to support those in the United States who create intellectual property has never been more important to our economy."
But radio station owners, with the the National Assn. of Broadcasters leading the fight, oppose the bill. "Local radio broadcasters consider this fee a 'performance tax' that will not only harm your local radio stations, but will threaten new artists trying to break into the business as well as your constituents who rely on local radio," NAB president and CEO David Rehr, said in a statment. "Although the proponents of H.R. 848 claim this bill is about compensating artists, in actuality at least half of this fee will go directly into the pockets of the big record labels, funneling billions of dollars to companies based overseas." Three of the four largest record label conglomerates -- Universal Music Group, Sony Music Entertainment, and EMI -- are internationally-based. "Although the big record labels have seen their revenues decline over the last decade, local radio broadcasters are not the reason the recording industry is losing money, and it should not be the industry to fix it," he added.
NAB said a measure opposing today's Congressional action is expected to be introduced shortly.
Likewise the Radio Free Alliance said, "Congressman Conyers' re-introduction of a performance tax bill on local radio is disappointing, especially since the bill doesn't reflect the views of the majority of his colleagues. Last year, the more than 226 members of Congress stood with local radio in opposing any measure that would tax local radio to benefit the big, foreign-owned labels. Especially in the dire economic times we all face, any measure which will threaten the family-supporting jobs of more than 125,000 people employed by radio, the more than $6 billion in local community support of non-profit and service organizations, and the ability to introduce more diversity in station ownership is a short-sighted approach and bad public policy."
But the proposed legislation accommodates small broadcasters, public and religious radio stations, according to a musicFirst press release. For example, small commercial stations would pay only $5,000 per year; while noncommercial stations such as NPR and college radio stations would pay only $1,000 per year; stations that make only incidental uses of music, such as "talk radio stations, would not pay for that music; and Religious services that are broadcast on radio would be completely exempt."
The legislation also is written to ensure that a new royalty wouldn't impact songwriters and other copyright owners, the press release said. The legislation provides for the rate to be negotiated between impacted parties, or set by the Copyright Royalty Board, and paid to SoundExchange, which will distribute payments accordingly.
On the latter issue, NMPA president and CEO David Israelite said in a statement, "The National Music Publishers' Association has proposed a concept called, "One Music", urging the entire music community to be supportive of each other regarding the value of music. Therefore, we support the efforts of Chairman Leahy and Chairman Conyers in introducing this bill. We are pleased the bill introduced today includes some protections so songwriters are not harmed in the process of fairly compensating performers and record labels - a must for any such legislation.
"We will continue to work closely with lawmakers and our partners in the music industry as this legislation moves through the process to make sure songwriters are not adversely affected."
February 04, 2009 - Legal and Management
By Ed Christman, N.Y.
As expected the Performance Right Act has been reintroduced jointly to Congress today with Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Senators Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Bob Corker (R-TN), and Barbara Boxer (D-CA) submitting it in the Senate, while in the House by Representatives, it was sponsored by Rep. John Conyers (D-MI), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, and Representatives Howard Berman (D-CA), Darrell Issa (R-CA), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), Jane Harman (D-CA), John Shadegg (R-AZ), and Paul Hodes (D-NH).
While radio already pays songwriters for songs they broadcast over the air, the bill would require royalties to also be paid the artists and musicians performing the songs and master recordings copyright owners, as well.
The latter payment is common in other countries and has already been enacted in the U.S. for Webcasters, satellite radio, cable radio services and all other non-terrestrial broadcasters.
Upon introduction of the Performance Rights Act in the Senate and House of Representatives, music FIRST executive director Jennifer Bendall, said in a statement, "Today marks the beginning of the end for corporate radio's loophole."
"It's unfair, unjustified and un-American that artists and musicians are paid absolutely nothing when their recordings are played on AM and FM radio," she added.
Grammy winner Sam Moore noted, "American broadcasters literally earn billions by playing our records. All we ask is to receive what artists in every other civilized country around the world receive when their recordings are broadcast - fair compensation for the performance of our work."
American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada (AFM) urges Congress to pass the Performance Rights Act because "The overwhelming majority of performers are not rich, but hardworking men and women trying to make a living," AFM President Tom Lee said in a statement.
Besides the U.S., only a few countries do not provide a fair performance right on radio, including Iran, North Korea and China. Since the U.S. doesn't have a performance right, foreign stations do not have to pay American artists when their music is played on stations around the globe.
A2IM President Rich Bengloff labeled the bills sponsors "true friends of the music community who understand that creators of music and those that invest in its creation should be compensated for their work. As the manufacturing and service industries have moved offshore, the need to support those in the United States who create intellectual property has never been more important to our economy."
But radio station owners, with the the National Assn. of Broadcasters leading the fight, oppose the bill. "Local radio broadcasters consider this fee a 'performance tax' that will not only harm your local radio stations, but will threaten new artists trying to break into the business as well as your constituents who rely on local radio," NAB president and CEO David Rehr, said in a statment. "Although the proponents of H.R. 848 claim this bill is about compensating artists, in actuality at least half of this fee will go directly into the pockets of the big record labels, funneling billions of dollars to companies based overseas." Three of the four largest record label conglomerates -- Universal Music Group, Sony Music Entertainment, and EMI -- are internationally-based. "Although the big record labels have seen their revenues decline over the last decade, local radio broadcasters are not the reason the recording industry is losing money, and it should not be the industry to fix it," he added.
NAB said a measure opposing today's Congressional action is expected to be introduced shortly.
Likewise the Radio Free Alliance said, "Congressman Conyers' re-introduction of a performance tax bill on local radio is disappointing, especially since the bill doesn't reflect the views of the majority of his colleagues. Last year, the more than 226 members of Congress stood with local radio in opposing any measure that would tax local radio to benefit the big, foreign-owned labels. Especially in the dire economic times we all face, any measure which will threaten the family-supporting jobs of more than 125,000 people employed by radio, the more than $6 billion in local community support of non-profit and service organizations, and the ability to introduce more diversity in station ownership is a short-sighted approach and bad public policy."
But the proposed legislation accommodates small broadcasters, public and religious radio stations, according to a musicFirst press release. For example, small commercial stations would pay only $5,000 per year; while noncommercial stations such as NPR and college radio stations would pay only $1,000 per year; stations that make only incidental uses of music, such as "talk radio stations, would not pay for that music; and Religious services that are broadcast on radio would be completely exempt."
The legislation also is written to ensure that a new royalty wouldn't impact songwriters and other copyright owners, the press release said. The legislation provides for the rate to be negotiated between impacted parties, or set by the Copyright Royalty Board, and paid to SoundExchange, which will distribute payments accordingly.
On the latter issue, NMPA president and CEO David Israelite said in a statement, "The National Music Publishers' Association has proposed a concept called, "One Music", urging the entire music community to be supportive of each other regarding the value of music. Therefore, we support the efforts of Chairman Leahy and Chairman Conyers in introducing this bill. We are pleased the bill introduced today includes some protections so songwriters are not harmed in the process of fairly compensating performers and record labels - a must for any such legislation.
"We will continue to work closely with lawmakers and our partners in the music industry as this legislation moves through the process to make sure songwriters are not adversely affected."
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
Blitz the Ambassador (new single) "Nothing to Lose" ft. Kate Mattison
Blitz new single 'Nothing to Lose' ft. Kate Mattison. Free download at RCRDLBL.com http://rcrdlbl.com/artists/Blitz_The_Ambassad or/music Enjoy
checkout his EPK below!
BLITZ EPKu from Team Blitz on Vimeo.
checkout his EPK below!
BLITZ EPKu from Team Blitz on Vimeo.
The Lonely Island ft. T-Pain - I'm On A Boat
The same guys who did Dick in a Box and Jizz in My Pants have a new song featuring T-Pain. Click here to download I'm On A Boat.
http://www.zshare.net/audio/551071673c33d7a3/
Wednesday, January 21, 2009
Friday, January 16, 2009
Sunday, January 4, 2009
Casting for Authenticity: The Search for NOTORIOUS B.I.G.
Finding an actor who brings home the title role in a biographical homage to Christopher Wallace was the most difficult challenge for this film. They wanted someone who so realistically portrayed NOTORIOUS B.I.G. that his mother, his friends, and his business associates would all agree wholeheartedly. The first week of high volume casting auditions left the team feeling discouraged.
The next week a miracle occured. Jamal Woolard delivered the complexity, performance, energy, essence, attitude, warmth, charisma and desire of Christopher in a way that no one else could begin to approach. Casting Director Wendy McKenzie met Jamal, and said to herself "it's him". Casting Director Tracy "Twinkie" Byrd saw "the swagger". Biggie's mother, Voletta Wallace, felt that Jamal "came in looking like Christopher, my son, sounding like Christopher, my son, and had that old attitude, too". When she saw him in the monitor, she honestly thought that it was her son.
That's the kind of authenticity that makes characters real, that suspends the audience' disbelief. I can hardly wait for the premiere.
The next week a miracle occured. Jamal Woolard delivered the complexity, performance, energy, essence, attitude, warmth, charisma and desire of Christopher in a way that no one else could begin to approach. Casting Director Wendy McKenzie met Jamal, and said to herself "it's him". Casting Director Tracy "Twinkie" Byrd saw "the swagger". Biggie's mother, Voletta Wallace, felt that Jamal "came in looking like Christopher, my son, sounding like Christopher, my son, and had that old attitude, too". When she saw him in the monitor, she honestly thought that it was her son.
That's the kind of authenticity that makes characters real, that suspends the audience' disbelief. I can hardly wait for the premiere.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
